Use Case Scenarios
      Back to home
      1. IT Support
      2. XactAnalysis Integration
      3. Use Case Scenarios

      Client/Carrier creates the claim in XactAnalysis and Adjuster enters inspection data after scoping in Xactimate

      • In this case, the claims would be created and assigned in XactAnalyis.
      • The same data would be available in Brush Claims home instance of XactAnalysis. (like a parent-child relation, where the parent is the XactAnalysis owned by Verisk and Child would be Brush Claims instance of XactAnalysis).
      • The claim must be created in Hubvia through EDI.
      • The Adjuster gets the assignment of the claim and will use Xactimate to enter the inspection data.
      • Xactimate will generate estimates based on the data entered by the Adjuster.
      • The Adjuster hits 'connect' in Xactimate and the estimates would be pushed to XactAnalysis home instance.
      • The supervisor reviews the estimates in XactAnalysis and if no corrections are needed then the status would change to QA approved.
      • The estimates would be pushed to XactAnalysis Parent Instance and Hubvia as well. This data would be kept in Hubvia storage.
      • Hubvia will use the estimates to populate TGL and will change the status of the claim to 'Ready to Invoice'.
      • The details of inspection, docs, attachments, images and all of the estimation data is stored in Hubvia's data storage as they set the base for any future references. (History Data).
      • The role of Hubvia in this scenario would be to get all of those data in XactAnalysis and get the invoicing and payment part done.